I put all of the forum entries in the Society for Cultural Anthropology’s (2014) The Politics of Ontology forum (https://culanth.org/fieldsights/series/the-politics-of-ontology) into a Markov chain text generator. This is the 1,490 word result.
Ontology provides a patient’s complaints, the otherwise as it “figurates” the signal contributions of Indra’s net is its history and Viveiros de la Cadena 2010.) The interesting divergence here or another, so much we learned the primary school curriculum, and not need for the cosmos and it takes place of Marxist that we cannot be understood outside which “ontology” is fundamentally concerned with “the permanent theoretical revolution wards off — in principle at least as ontological politics of metaphysical ontology cannot shed from the entities that the present alternatives to other accounts are able to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro 2009; for all accounts are one world in me repeatedly asked instead becomes subject puts effort here we could be, otherwise(good). The limit myself to be but basically nothing but in philosophy and reproduce this is immanent ontology and taken place limits we study and this political is correct in kind to be dispelled is precisely not think itself and overshadowed modes of the lab-ethnographers emerged out of the rising mercantilist desire of that all the position on this asymmetry, I ask Holbraad, Pedersen, and what we need of the implicit form of the philosophical key of speaking a mountain) participating in its own), and time when we can be segregated from the other disciplines — far more aligned with their relationships of Marxist Recapitulating, to other kinds of this emerging bundle of power differences between ethnographic descriptions, like an attempt to the highlighting of a first of first takes its relation that the pretense of ontology enacted in a statement I want to interpret them are embroiled, including how it is (Ontology1), so on) seem to branch into forms of the Ooni’s palace at least. And that require analysis, but rarely questioned. This may be engaged in debates rage within the multiplicity is really have greater access to say that this book I want to keep in the Bronze Age Tell of touching “the ontological.” The anthropological analysis or actualize the ontologically-inclined anthropologist: in this is (and should) ultimately be the being transposed into fact-finding: their stead the same thing. The risk in the state of our faulty metaphysics — which makes the possibility of the term “politics” — an immovable object if ever there is nevertheless a commitment to bear in a term ontology for a group of existents/existence builds into our lives. It is pursued. The fact that are (characterized as figures emerging from transparently mapping one (modern, multicultural, etc.) Although analyses do things to make a critical view of the ontological multiplicity necessarily have noticed, if recognized, can assess what then? In daily clinical practice, a synchronic, geographical plane, Descola shows that this metaphysical bases of positions) as a radical shape of description (Pedersen 2012a) designed in front of intellectual means internal to life as ontological contests or imperatives about as the entities we can overlook alterity. At the numbers that involves, technically speaking, symbolic reference, which to square that opens the transformation due to lend the question are familiar comparison as figures in some stories. In other reals — how things should be. The new forms of ontologies and (3) the Occidental tradition. Other hospital fieldwork in their stead the mining corporation. Visual perspectivism implies a world, and that discussion of secrecy and for us, we might be heard. The politics as self-determination of this means to externally-defined political calls to and sanctioned in the pretense of potting was one finds diverging conceptions of that God and decolonizing turn. That emergence of the peoples but rarely actually access to be the resisting and other words, “politics” takes place either. This may still singular. The claim is this: if, for cosmopolitical concepts with the primary school curriculum, and where we must be listened to elude it, which highlights this subjunctive, “could be” is not so that a means, perhaps because we are familiar to and one of global arrangement. If that the otherwise); an ontologically-focused ethnography as facts that must manage their stead the one of academia) that any argument to enter. Or, could alter from the knower and the translation of decolonization by what it is implied by, or knowledge production of thinking that the second generation, by the post-theoretical United States) how certain imperative. And while ontology — put in front of the mode of ethnographic knowledge-practices is “permanent” means by scientists and its own core with the position paper by side of being grown in relation between the well-known renaissance belief and a political have been restricted to address that the time is evinced in world (a figuring out in my contribution to the political force fields is what modern West and clarifications, are laying out of the otherwise is inevitably given body of complementary opposites. Finally, one that optics, as long time, no simultaneously autonomous terms of entity-state, namely that has become depleted. It means in one that have the limitations of this insight, my view, there is no difference largely becomes the mining corporation. All this, too, looked different. If any given that marginally different (more moot) idea of internal capacities). In the political question about capitalism. Now, in which includes Foucault and culture such material with particular theoretical term, anaemia, is exposed for intervening in the term — is that anthropological explanation must be studying actually access to what an impossible to the one of ontology with the only defined by the anthropologists who deploy “ontology” as an immanent property of being to the people might be bad: What exactly does that clinics were the ontological politics that processes may constitute its translations and those of forms of method. There is currently beginning stories of ontological argumentation to declarations about capitalism. The anthropology is the dominance of how it appears (in my beginning: “The anthropology should be a field of the world to phenomenology in the conversation might fit together. Though the Latourian corpus culminating in a form of difference and bads are composed of anthropology is an account of any argument to contrast possible, the entities it should engage the world one. We stress that the political act — a radical difference-within politics within what was about the transformations will not. He thereby provides a case shows, requires some of which ‘gives being or nature.) This is exposed for an ethnographic materials. These are: (1) the way of sylvan thinking about. If any theoretical movement entering its seams, composed to me that, no evidence that there involves both merchants and the ethnographer has a conception of reality is more solid for essential truth — how things could be, always been so much from all peoples but bears thinking about. These days, in an earth-being, also always been tending, in a political ontologies — including anthropology’s, that carefully emptied of thought” seriously, but also within (or before) the social constructionism. If that the problems with supporting ethnic essentialization, Blut und Boden primordialism, and need only if the politics on “could”: “Imagine a powerful word for performing the question at all. One would describe their properties have been collapsed. Any distinction of ontology indexed is called, How and sanctioned in renaissance paintings’ mono-perspectival gaze was part of things should enact an artistically radical or novel way Amazonian cosmology turns of history, explaining it may include people’s “thoughts” but its inauguration as everything stands — are left one is entailed in the material can be enough like something about the problem of possibility of critique. That emergence of the modern metaphysics of power, domination, or less in the case, one of descriptions are doing political symmetry with ontological turn, the big issue of seeing,” which to be heard. Similarly, the ancient, indigenous, and unchallenged. This number but this “alliance” as ontology. Minor realities on an earlier version of its hegemony. More importantly, intrinsic multiplicity — whether this experience as the old anthropological metaphysics does the fundamental categories and metaphysical politics — that could be — what Elizabeth Grosz (2005, 129) has to describe the same place either. However, at every scale, or novel way or imperatives about Nature of what this level of making the context where doing political just walk away the ways in this or not, the Anthropocene can and fixed collection of the anthropology as (modern, multicultural, etc.) We mobilized the position piece makes clear, but this rejection, stabilize it. This is precisely not an earth-being, also take a real that are in the Bronze Age Tell of the definitions of ontological ought to the world’s things.” This is implied by, or authority are contingent foundations from them by the negative spaces — the ligatures — can be both what can be welcomed. To put in anthropology has put them as enactments we know whether we face today in human is here (“power differences”). What is that the new spaces of ethnographic relation. By contrast, ontology as advocating a mountain was judged by the latter, key of Zuhandenheit, lived experience, perceptual/cognitive forms, historical conditions, and the very nature and the ontologically-inclined anthropologist: in politics of existence.